Illustration of seated person using speech to text software on a computer.


The Big Ten Academic Alliance (BTAA) began funding high-level third-party accessibility evaluations for select vendor e-resources in 2017. In 2019, the Association of Research Libraries (ASERL) joined in these and other library accessibility efforts, becoming the Library Accessibility Alliance (LAA).

The LAA selects e-resources based upon recommendations from our member libraries and the platforms that the majority of the consortia own or are considering for purchase.


The LAA contracts with third-party, independent accessibility consulting companies to perform high-level accessibility evaluations based on WCAG 2.1 AA. These tests are not full, comprehensive evaluations. The consulting companies are given a designated number of hours for the evaluations and are intended to identify some, but not all, accessibility issues and barriers. The tests are performed using screen reader software such as JAWS or NVDA.

DequeUniversity of Tennessee Knoxville’s User Experience Lab, and Michigan State University's Usability/Accessibility Research and Consulting (UARC) have conducted the evaluations.

The LAA typically selects two vendors a month to test and submits scoping documents (example scoping document) to our consultant companies. The scoping document outlines typical library e-resource tasks a user might perform such as basic and advanced searching, viewing search results, applying filters and refining results, and viewing individual items.


The program provides vendors with a report and the opportunity to improve the accessibility of their products, while giving members of the library community information about the accessibility of specific library e-resources.

All evaluations funded by the LAA are provided to e-resource vendors free of charge. Vendors are invited to submit a response and attend a consultation call with our consultant companies, also at no charge. All e-resource accessibility evaluations and vendor responses are publicly available below.


80 E-Resource Reports

The following table contains all evaluations completed to date. To access the evaluation summary and full report for any e-resource, select the e-resource name link. The table can be sorted by e-resource, by vendor, or by date. To re-sort the table, select the column heading you wish to sort by.

An XML feed is available here: XML

Accessibility evaluations organized by date and vendor name.
E-Resource Report Sort descending Vendor Date of Evaluation Vendor Response
Academic Search Ebsco 04/23/2020 Ebsco Response (pdf)
Accessible Archives Accessible Archives, Inc. 09/04/2019 N/A
AccessMedicine McGraw-Hill 07/16/2019 N/A
ACS Publications ACS (American Chemical Society) 03/03/2020 N/A
Adam Matthew - Empire Online Adam Matthew 03/26/2018 Adam Matthew Response (pdf)
Alexander Street Alexander Press 01/03/2022 N/A
Ambrose Video Ambrose Video 06/24/2019 N/A
American Society for Microbiology (ASM) Journals American Society for Micorbiology 02/20/2019 N/A
Americas Historical Newspapers Readex 11/16/2018 N/A
ArtStor ArtStor 06/29/2018 N/A
BioOne Complete BioOne 01/29/2020 BioOne Response (pdf)
Bloomsbury Drama Online Bloomsbury 01/03/2022 N/A
Brill e-Books Brill 10/05/2018 N/A
Cambridge Core Cambridge University Press 11/01/2017 Cambridge Core Update 2019 (pdf)
Collaborative Archive & Data Research Environment (CADRE) Project CADRE 10/09/2020 CADRE Response (pdf)
DataPlanet SAGE 11/03/2021 SAGE Publishing Response (pdf)
De Gruyter Walter de Gruyter GmbH 03/09/2021 N/A
Directory of Open Access Journals Directory of Open Access Journals 05/13/2019 DOAJ Response (pdf)
Disability in the Modern World Alexander Press 10/15/2019 N/A
Dissertations & Theses Global ProQuest 02/16/2017 Dissertations & Theses Global Response (pdf)
DocuSeek2 ProQuest 02/20/2020 N/A
East View Platform East View Information Services, Inc. 09/04/2019 N/A
eBook Central ProQuest 11/27/2017 ProQuest Response (pdf)
Ebook Platform Ebsco 04/21/2017 Ebsco Response Previous (pdf)
ECCO Gale 09/11/2017 Gale Response
Empire Online Adam Matthew 03/26/2018 Adam Matthew Response (pdf)
Engineering Village Elsevier 04/16/2018 Elsevier Response (pdf)
Factiva Dow Jones/ProQuest 09/21/2021 N/A
Films on Demand Infobase 07/11/2018 N/A
FirstSearch OCLC 01/03/2020 N/A
Fulcrum University of Michigan 08/16/2019 U of M Updated Response 12/2019 (pdf)
Gale Primary Sources Gale 04/14/2020 Gale Response (pdf)
GoogleScholar Google 12/18/2020 N/A
HathiTrust HathiTrust 06/17/2020 N/A
HeinOnline William S. Hein & Co., Inc. 05/06/2021 N/A
IBISWorld IBISWorld 12/10/2019 N/A
IGI Global IGI Global 07/27/2020 N/A
Independent Voices Reveal Digital 12/02/2019 Reveal Digital Response (pdf)
InternetArchive Internet Archive 12/10/2020 N/A
IOP eBooks IOP Publishing 05/21/2018 N/A
JoVE Science Education JoVE 11/02/2021 N/A
JSTOR JSTOR 10/26/2017 N/A
Kanopy Kanopy 02/04/2021 N/A
Knowledge Unlatched Knowledge Unlatched 10/23/2019 N/A
Lexis Nexis Uni LexisNexis 05/03/2018 N/A
LinkedIn Learning Platform LinkedIn Learning 05/21/2020 N/A
MathSciNet American Mathematical Society 11/26/2018 N/A
Mergent Online FTSE Russell 01/15/2019 N/A
Morgan and Claypool Synthesis Morgan and Claypool Publishers 02/04/2019 N/A
National Technical Reports Library (NTRL) National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce 07/11/2021 N/A
Naxos Music Library Naxos Digital Services 08/13/2021 N/A
NetAdvantage Standard & Poor's Global Market Intelligence 08/17/2020 N/A
OVID LWW Wolters Kluwer N.V. 02/12/2018 N/A
Oxford Journals Oxford University Press 05/30/2018 N/A
Oxford Music Online Oxford University Press 11/29/2021 N/A
PLOS One PLOS (Public Library of Science) 08/14/2020 N/A
Popular Culture in Britain & America (Adam Matthew) Adam Matthew 11/22/2021 N/A
Project MUSE Project MUSE 06/10/2020 Project MUSE Response (pdf)
PsycINFO on Ovid Platform Ovid 03/08/2021 N/A
PsycNet APA 08/10/2021 N/A
PubMed National Library of Medicine 04/30/2021 N/A
Rittenhouse R2 Rittenhouse Book Distributors, Inc. 05/29/2019 Rittenhouse Response (pdf)
SAGE e-Journals SAGE 07/12/2017 N/A
SAGE Research Methods SAGE 11/08/2019 N/A
ScienceDirect Platform Elsevier 04/21/2017 Elsevier Response (pdf)
SciFinder CAS (Chemical Abstracts Service) 05/03/2019 N/A
SciFinder N CAS (Chemical Abstracts Service) 05/21/2020 N/A
Scopus Elsevier 11/16/2020 N/A
SPIE Digital Library Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) 07/17/2021 N/A
SpringerLink Springer Nature 07/09/2018 N/A
SpringerNature Springer Nature 01/04/2018 N/A
Swank Motion Pictures Swank Motion Pictures 03/27/2020 N/A
Taylor & Francis e-Books Taylor & Francis 08/28/2018 Taylor & Francis e-Books Response (pdf)
Taylor & Francis e-Journal Taylor & Francis 11/07/2017 Taylor & Francis Response (pdf)
Techstreet Clarivate Analytics 12/10/2018 N/A
Web of Science Platform Clarivate Analytics 05/31/2021 Clarivate Analytics Response to Previous Evaluation (pdf)
Wiley Online Library John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 01/12/2021 N/A
World Newspaper Archive Readex 12/16/2021 N/A
World Scientific World Scientific 10/02/2020 N/A
WorldCat OCLC 10/28/2020 OCLC Response (pdf)